Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStøvland, Varg Ringdal
dc.contributor.authorAmundsen, Roar
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Gøran
dc.contributor.authorDalen-Lorentsen, Torstein
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T11:35:19Z
dc.date.available2024-02-09T11:35:19Z
dc.date.created2023-12-04T12:58:47Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2023, 9(4), Artikkel e001634.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2055-7647
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3116591
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The 11+ is an effective injury prevention warm-up programme but is often poorly adopted in practice. One reason for low compliance is the claim that the strength training part of the programme acutely impairs muscle performance before the football activity. This study aims to compare the acute effects of the 11+ with (WU+S) or without (WU-S) the strength training part on performance. Methods: Fifteen female junior football players completed WU+S and WU-S on two separate days in randomised order. Maximal voluntary torque in knee extension and flexion (60°/s and 180°/s) and countermovement jump (CMJ) were tested before and after performing the warm-up protocol. Sprint performance and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were assessed post-warm-up. Results: Warm-up with strength training reduced peak torque in knee flexion at 180°/s more than WU-S, while no differences were found at 60°/s. Knee extension work was reduced more with WU+S than WU-S at 180°/s, but no differences at 60°/s. Peak torque angle and CMJ were unaffected. Players were slower on 20 and 30 m sprints after WU+S than WU-S. The RPE was higher after WU+S than WU-S, but there were no differences in readiness to train between the two protocols. Conclusion: Performing the 11+ programme as a warm-up routine with the strength training part can impair subsequent knee flexion torque at high velocity and sprint performance in female junior football players compared with performing the 11+ warm-up without the strength part.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subject11+en_US
dc.subjectFIFA 11+en_US
dc.subjecthealthen_US
dc.subjectperiodisationen_US
dc.subjectplanningen_US
dc.subjectpreparationen_US
dc.subjectresistance exerciseen_US
dc.subjectsessionen_US
dc.subjectsocceren_US
dc.subjectwarm upen_US
dc.titlePrepare to fail or failing to prepare?: Acute performance after the 11+ with and without strength exercisesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023en_US
dc.source.pagenumber7en_US
dc.source.volume9en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicineen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001634
dc.identifier.cristin2208439
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere001634en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel