Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSigurdardottir, Thorgerdur
dc.contributor.authorSteingrimsdóttir, Thora
dc.contributor.authorGeirsson, Reynir T.
dc.contributor.authorHalldorsson, Thorhallur I.
dc.contributor.authorAspelund, Thor
dc.contributor.authorBø, Kari
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T09:32:33Z
dc.date.available2024-03-19T09:32:33Z
dc.date.created2023-03-31T09:23:56Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationInternational Urogynecology Journal. 2023, 34, 1319-1326.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3123036
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på link.springer.com / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available at link.springer.comen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and Hypothesis: Pelvic floor dysfunction is common after childbirth. We hypothesize that physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is effective regarding pelvic organ prolapse (POP) symptoms during the first postpartum year. Methods: This was a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial (RCT), carried out at a physiotherapy clinic, Reykjavik. Participants were eighty-four primiparous women with a singleton delivery. They were screened for eligibility 6–13 weeks postpartum. Women in a training group conducted 12 weekly individual sessions with a physiotherapist within an RCT, starting on average 9 weeks postpartum. Outcomes were assessed after the last session (short term) and at approximately 12 months postpartum (long term). The control group received no instructions after the initial assessment. Main outcome measures were self-evaluated POP symptoms by the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire. Results: Forty-one and 43 women were in the training and control groups, respectively. At recruitment, 17 (42.5%) of the training group and 15 (37%) of the control group reported prolapse symptoms (p = 0.6). Five (13%) from the training group and nine (21%) controls were bothered by the symptoms (p = 0.3). There was a gradual decrease in the number of women with symptoms and no significant short-term (p = 0.08) or long-term (p = 0.6) differences between the groups regarding rates of women with POP symptoms. The difference between groups regarding bother in the short (p = 0.3) or longer term (p = 0.4) was not significant. Repeated-measures analyses using Proc Genmod in SAS did not indicate a significant effect of the intervention over time (p > 0.05). Conclusions: There was an overall decrease in postpartum symptoms of POP and bother during the first year. Physiotherapist-led PFMT did not change the outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectpelvic floor muscle trainingen_US
dc.subjectpelvic floor musclesen_US
dc.subjectpelvic organ prolapseen_US
dc.subjectphysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectpostpartumen_US
dc.subjectprimiparityen_US
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_US
dc.titlePostpartum pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor muscle training: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primiparous womenen_US
dc.title.alternativePostpartum pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor muscle training: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primiparous womenen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1319-1326en_US
dc.source.volume34en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Urogynecology Journalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-023-05502-8
dc.identifier.cristin2138759
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel