Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGonjo, Tomohiro
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Ricardo J.
dc.contributor.authorVilas-Boas, João-Paulo
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Ross
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T07:55:58Z
dc.date.available2020-10-15T07:55:58Z
dc.date.created2019-12-16T12:59:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biomechanics. 2020, 98(2020), 109452.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-9290
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2682941
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på sciencedirect.com / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at sciencedirect.comen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate why front crawl is faster than backstroke from a kinematic perspective. Three-dimensional kinematics were obtained from one upper-limb cycle of ten male competitive swimmers performing 50 m front crawl and backstroke trials at maximum speed. Swimmers achieved faster centre of mass velocity in front crawl than backstroke (1.70 ± 0.04 vs 1.54 ± 0.06 m·s−1; p < 0.01) with no difference in stroke length (2.00 ± 0.25 vs 2.07 ± 0.17 m·cycle−1), while stroke frequency in front crawl was higher than that in backstroke (51.67 ± 6.38 vs 44.81 ± 4.68 cycles·min−1; p < 0.01). Maximum shoulder roll angle in front crawl was larger than that in backstroke (52.88 ± 4.89 vs 49.73 ± 5.73°; p < 0.05), while swimmers had smaller maximum hip roll in front crawl than backstroke (33.79 ± 6.07 vs 39.83 ± 7.25°; p < 0.05). Absolute duration of the release phase (from the last backward movement to the exit from the water of the wrist) and relative duration of the recovery phase were shorter in front crawl than backstroke (0.07 ± 0.03 vs 0.26 ± 0.08 s; p < 0.01, and 28.69 ± 2.50 vs 33.21 ± 1.43%; p < 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, front crawl is faster than backstroke because of its higher stroke frequency due to the shorter absolute release phase and relative recovery phase durations.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectalternating strokesen_US
dc.subjectperformanceen_US
dc.subjectaquatic locomotionen_US
dc.subjectstroke frequencyen_US
dc.subjectstroke lengthen_US
dc.subjectmotion analysisen_US
dc.titleUpper body kinematic differences between maximum front crawl and backstroke swimmingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Biomechanicsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109452
dc.identifier.cristin1761171
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel