Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMartin-Rincon, Marcos
dc.contributor.authorGelabert-Rebato, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Valera, Mario
dc.contributor.authorGalvan-Alvarez, Victor
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Alamo, David
dc.contributor.authorDorado, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorBoushel, Robert
dc.contributor.authorHallén, Jostein
dc.contributor.authorCalbet, José Antonio López
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T16:20:56Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T16:20:56Z
dc.date.created2021-08-06T10:07:43Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Physiology. 2021, 599(16), 3853-3878.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3751
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2833457
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to ascertain what mechanisms explain sex differences at task failure and to determine whether males and females have a functional reserve at exhaustion. Exercise performance, cardiorespiratory variables, oxygen deficit, and brain and muscle oxygenation were determined in 18 males and 18 females (21–36 years old) in two sessions consisting of three bouts of constant-power exercise at 120% of VO2max until exhaustion interspaced by 20 s recovery periods. In one of the two sessions, the circulation of both legs was occluded instantaneously (300 mmHg) during the recovery periods. Females had a higher muscle O2 extraction during fatiguing supramaximal exercise than males. Metaboreflex activation, and lean mass-adjusted O2 deficit and debt were similar in males and females. Compared to males, females reached lower PETCO2 and brain oxygenation during supramaximal exercise, without apparent negative consequences on performance. After the occlusions, males and females were able to restart exercising at 120% of VO2max, revealing a similar functional reserve, which depends on glycolytic component of substrate-level phosphorylation and its rate of utilization. After ischaemia, muscle O2 extraction was increased, and muscle was similarly reduced in males and females. The physiological response to repeated supramaximal exercise to exhaustion is remarkably similar in males and females when differences in lean mass are considered. Both sexes fatigue with a large functional reserve, which depends on the glycolytic energy supply, yet females have higher oxygen extraction capacity, but reduced PETCO2 and brain oxygenation. Key points • Females have lower fatigability than males during single limb isometric and dynamic contractions, but whether sex-differences exist during high-intensity whole-body exercise remains unknown. • This study shows that males and females respond similarly to repeated supramaximal whole-body exercise, and that at task failure a large functional reserve remains in both sexes. • Using post-exercise ischaemia with repeated exercise, we have shown that this functional reserve depends on the glycolytic component of substrate-level phosphorylation and is almost identical in both sexes. • Metaboreflex activation during post-exercise ischaemia and the O2 debt per kg of active lean mass are also similar in males and females after supramaximal exercise. • Females have a greater capacity to extract oxygen during repeated supramaximal exercise and reach lower PETCO2, experiencing a larger drop in brain oxygenation than males, without apparent negative repercussion on performance. • Females had no faster recovery of performance after accounting for sex differences in lean mass.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectbrain oxygenationen_US
dc.subjectfatigueen_US
dc.subjectischaemiaen_US
dc.subjectoxygen debten_US
dc.subjectoxygen deficiten_US
dc.subjectoxygen extractionen_US
dc.subjectperformanceen_US
dc.subjectsex dimorphismen_US
dc.titleFunctional reserve and sex differences during exercise to exhaustion revealed by post-exercise ischaemia and repeated supramaximal exerciseen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber3853-3878en_US
dc.source.volume599en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Physiologyen_US
dc.source.issue16en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1113/JP281293
dc.identifier.cristin1924320
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel