Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWang, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorEsbensen, Qin Ying
dc.contributor.authorKarlsen, Tommy Aleksander
dc.contributor.authorEftang, Cathrine Nørstad
dc.contributor.authorOwesen, Christian
dc.contributor.authorÅrøen, Asbjørn
dc.contributor.authorJakobsen, Rune Bruhn
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T13:57:03Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T13:57:03Z
dc.date.created2021-11-17T10:21:47Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCartilage. 2021, 13(Supplement 1), Side 550S-562S.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1947-6035
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2984337
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective To analyze and compare cartilage samples from 3 groups of patients utilizing low-input RNA-sequencing. Design Cartilage biopsies were collected from patients in 3 groups (n = 48): Cartilage lesion (CL) patients had at least ICRS grade 2, osteoarthritis (OA) samples were taken from patients undergoing knee replacement, and healthy cartilage (HC) was taken from ACL-reconstruction patients without CLs. RNA was isolated using an optimized protocol. RNA samples were assessed for quality and sequenced with a low-input SmartSeq2 protocol. Results RNA isolation yielded 48 samples with sufficient quality for sequencing. After quality control, 13 samples in the OA group, 9 in the HC group, and 9 in the CL group were included in the analysis. There was a high degree of co-clustering between the HC and CL groups with only 6 genes significantly up- or downregulated. OA and the combined HC/CL group clustered significantly separate from each other, yielding 659 significantly upregulated and 1,369 downregulated genes. GO-term analysis revealed that genes matched to cartilage and connective tissue development terms. Conclusion The gene expression profiles from the 3 groups suggest that there are no major differences in gene expression between cartilage from knees with a cartilage injury and knees without an apparent cartilage injury. OA cartilage, as expected, showed markedly different gene expression from the other 2 groups. The gene expression profiles resulting from this low-input RNA-sequencing study offer opportunities to discover new pathways not previously recognized that may be explored in future studies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectcartilage lesionen_US
dc.subjectgene expressionen_US
dc.subjecthealthy cartilageen_US
dc.subjectknee cartilageen_US
dc.subjectosteoarthritisen_US
dc.titleLow-input RNA-sequencing in patients with cartilage lesions, osteoarthritis, and healthy cartilageen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2021en_US
dc.source.pagenumber550S-562Sen_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalCartilageen_US
dc.source.issueSupplement 1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/19476035211057245
dc.identifier.cristin1955451
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel