• norsk
    • English
  • norsk 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Logg inn
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Norges idrettshøgskole
  • Publikasjoner fra Cristin
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Norges idrettshøgskole
  • Publikasjoner fra Cristin
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Does androgen deprivation for prostate cancer affect normal adaptation to resistance exercise?

Nilsen, Tormod Skogstad; Johansen, Sara Hassing; Thorsen, Lene; Fairman, Ciaran M.; Wisløff, Torbjørn; Raastad, Truls
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
Thumbnail
Åpne
Nilsen IJERPH 2022.pdf (588.7Kb)
Supplement [PDF] (139.5Kb)
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3010097
Utgivelsesdato
2022
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Artikler / Articles [1763]
  • Publikasjoner fra Cristin [751]
Originalversjon
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022, 19(7), Artikkel 3820.   10.3390/ijerph19073820
Sammendrag
Background: Loss of muscle mass and muscle function is a common side effect from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa). Here, we explored effects of heavy-load resistance training (RT) on lean body mass and muscle strength changes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among PCa patients on ADT and in healthy elderly men (HEM), by comparison of results in separate meta-analysis.

Methods: RCTs were identified through databases and reference lists.

Results: Seven RCTs in PCa patients (n = 449), and nine in HEM (n = 305) were included. The effects of RT in lean body mass change were similar among PCa patients (Standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.7) and HEM (SMD: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.7). It is noteworthy that the within group changes showed different patterns in PCa patients (intervention: 0.2 kg; control: −0.6 kg) and HEM (intervention: 1.2 kg; control: 0.2 kg). The effects of RT on change in muscle strength (measured as 1 RM) were similar between PCa patients and HEM, both for lower body- (PCa: SMD: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.5; HEM: SMD: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.0, 3.4), and for upper body exercises (PCa: SMD: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3, 2.7; HEM: SMD: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3, 2.6).

Conclusions: The effects of RT on lean body mass and 1 RM were similar in PCa patients on ADT and HEM, but the mechanism for the intervention effect might differ between groups. It seems that RT counteracts loss of lean body mass during ADT in PCa patients, as opposed to increasing lean body mass in HEM.
Beskrivelse
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Tidsskrift
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Opphavsrett
© 2022 by the authors

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit
 

 

Bla i

Hele arkivetDelarkiv og samlingerUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifterDenne samlingenUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifter

Min side

Logg inn

Statistikk

Besøksstatistikk

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit