Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorPrieske, Olaf
dc.contributor.authorStien, Nicolay
dc.contributor.authorCumming, Kristoffer Toldnes
dc.contributor.authorSolstad, Tom Erik Jorung
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Gøran
dc.contributor.authorvan den Tillaar, Roland Johannes Wilhelmus
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Helene
dc.contributor.authorSæterbakken, Atle Hole
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T08:42:55Z
dc.date.available2023-03-02T08:42:55Z
dc.date.created2022-10-14T19:25:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2022, 25(12), Side 1023-1032.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1440-2440
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3055183
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of the study was to aggregate different effects between variable resistance training and traditional resistance training on maximal muscle strength and muscle power and identify potential sex- and training program-related moderator variables. Design: Meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in SPORTDiscus, PubMed, and Web of Science. Interventions were included if they compared variable resistance training and traditional resistance training in healthy adults and examined the effects on measures of maximal muscle strength and/or muscle power of the lower and/or upper body. A random-effects model was used to calculate weighted and averaged standardized mean differences. Additionally, univariate sub-group analyses were independently computed for sex and training-related moderator variables. Results: Seventeen studies comprising a total of 491 participants (341 men and 150 women, age 18–37 years) were included in the analyses. In terms of maximal muscle strength, there were no statistically significant differences between variable resistance training and traditional resistance training for the lower (p = 0.46, standardized mean difference = −0.10) or the upper body (p = 0.14, standardized mean difference = −0.17). Additionally, there were no significant training-related differences in muscle power for the lower (p = 0.16, standardized mean difference = 0.21) or upper body (p = 0.81, standardized mean difference = 0.05). Sub-group analyses showed a significant moderator effect for training period and repetitions per set for maximal muscle strength in the lower body (p = 0.03–0.04) with larger strength gains following traditional resistance training when performing more repetitions per set (p = 0.02, standardized mean difference = 0.43). No other significant sub-group effects were found (p = 0.18–0.82). Conclusions: Our results suggest that variable resistance training and traditional resistance training are equally effective in improving maximal muscle strength and muscle power in healthy adults.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectchain resistanceen_US
dc.subjectelastic bandsen_US
dc.subjectpneumatic resistanceen_US
dc.subjectstrength trainingen_US
dc.titleComparing the effects of variable and traditional resistance training on maximal strength and muscle power in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1023-1032en_US
dc.source.volume25en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sporten_US
dc.source.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsams.2022.08.009
dc.identifier.cristin2061571
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel